New paths to affordable housing in NYC: a look at the Singapore model, by Sander Hicks

The number-one issue that 98 percent of New Yorkers care about is affordable housing. I have been studying the successful affordable housing programs in Singapore. New York City could learn a lot.

Let’s look at the work of Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. This guy was loved by the masses. Lee Kuan Yew was originally a union organizer and negotiator. He created a coalition that included socialists, and unions, and he rose to power in a tumultuous time. As Singapore was gaining independence from the UK, he was the first elected Prime Minister of this tiny city-state, located in Southeast Asia. “LKY,” as he was known, got reelected and held power for three decades in Singapore. He lifted the country out of poverty. His lifetime overlaps with Mao Tse Tung, but he is not as well-known, maybe because he was less ideological, and more pragmatic.

LKY’s big innovation in housing was to have the government directly build quality high-rises that people wanted to live in. He helped working people to buy these new apartments, with the Singapore government kicking in matching funds. A worker could save up to 5 percent of their wages in a government bank account, and the government would match each dollar of their savings contribution. Soon, working people in Singapore went from a housing crisis, to 92 percent home ownership. Today in NYC, we have 33 percent home ownership. The average rate in the USA overall is 64 percent.

Rent is a ripoff. We pay a big percentage of our income to a landlord, but we don’t get any long-term benefit. We get a temporary place to live, maybe on a one-year lease. A mortgage (if you can get one) is when you buy where you live and a third party, like a bank, credit union, or a government funding vehicle, finances the purchase, and breaks it down into payments. Instead of paying rent, you are paying toward owning land and living space, something that steadily goes up in value over time. As Bill Heywood used to say, “Nothing is too good for the working-class.” Home ownership would be a great benefit to working people, even if most of us in NYC don’t even think about it, due to the huge financial hurdles. Those hurdles don’t have to be there.

Home owners tend to be more interested in improving their living spaces, in maintaining a building’s infrastructure, creating the goodwill of shared common spaces, and maintaining exteriors, for the mutual benefit of the whole neighborhood. But many of us in NYC can’t think of owning a home. We are dominated by our culture’s blind faith in the free market. That free market is a volatile monster that favors real estate developers, economic roller-coasters, gentrification and displacement. It has chased us around this city, and has robbed us of the long-term and stable housing that is our human right.

Housing can also be a way to fight racism. In Singapore, before LKY, there was a lot of rivalry between ethnic Chinese, Malays, and Indians, the three main racial groups. But in the new Singapore housing, racial diversity was mandatory: every floor of each apartment building had an equal representation of the various racial groups in Singapore. They did this to prevent the build-up of racial tension, by neighborhood or building.

Here in New York City the situation is dire. No new public housing projects have been built since 1997. 1997 was 23 years ago. Rent in NYC commands an abnormally high percentage of wages. NYCHA units are on an “affordable rent” model, but they are falling apart. The broken locks on front doors and the scent of urine in the stairwells seem to be representative of the smell of defeat. There’s a huge backlog of repair requests. The mayor is currently rolling out a private-public partnership, called “RAD.” It’s not enough.

The rate of home ownership in NYC is extremely low, and no one is addressing this. 33 percent home ownership is half the national average in the USA. We’re supposed to be the greatest city in the world, but we don’t take care of our people. We don’t make housing a human right. That has to change. Capital has a role to play here, not capitalism. The city government needs to set up a new public interest bank to contribute matching funds for affordable home ownership in NYC. We need to build more projects of quality affordable housing, like in Singapore.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Comments are closed.

READ OUR FULL PRINT EDITION

Our Sister Publication

a word from our sponsors!

Latest Media Guide!

Where to find the Star-Revue

Instagram

How many have visited our site?

wordpress hit counter

Social Media

Most Popular

On Key

Related Posts

Brooklyn Borough President makes a speech, by Brian Abate

On March 13, Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso delivered his State of the Borough speech in front of a packed crowd of hundreds of people at New York City College of Technology. Reynoso spoke about a variety of issues including how to move freight throughout the city in safe, sustainable, and efficient ways. The problem is one that Jim Tampakis

Local group renames itself, by Nathan Weiser

The Red Hook Civic Association met on March 26 at the Red Hook Recreation Center. The March meeting was the group’s first anniversary. According to Nico Kean, the April meeting will consist of a special celebration with a party and a progress report, and will be held at the Red Hook Coffee Shop on Van Brunt Street. A name change

Women celebrated at the Harbor Middle School, by Nathan Weiser

PS 676 Harbor Middle School held a family fun STEM night in the cafeteria for the students and parents. There was a special focus on women in science as March is Women’s History month. There were also hands-on math and science activities at tables and outside organizations at the event. There was a women’s history coloring table. A drawing was

Participatory Budgeting Vote Week, by Katherine Rivard

Council Member Shahana Hanif, her staff, several artists from the nonprofit Arts & Democracy Project, and a handful of volunteers all gathered in the Old Stone House in Park Slope on a Monday evening last month. At the start of the meeting, each person introduced themselves and stated their artistic skills, before being assigned a project and getting down to